Question
According to Al-Haq Pakistan is not an Islamic state. However, in the year 2016, a fatwa prepared by the International Islamic University, and signed by 1,800 scholars stated that Pakistan is an Islamic state. What is your response? Please comment in detail.
Answer
Pakistan, since its very inception, never was an Islamic state. Its Fussaaq/Fujjaar Munaafiq founders also had not proclaimed the country to be an Islamic state. They had merely dangled the chimera of an 'islamic state' to beguile simple molvis and ignorant Muslims who had leanings towards the Deen. This deception was perpetrated to gain Muslim support for the establishment of Pakistan.
But, at no stage did any government of Pakistan even make an attempt to establish a Shar'i state or to convert the kufr regime into an Islamic State. With the solitary exception of President Ziyaaul Haq, who had not succeeded, there never was any movement of any of the successive kufr governments to introduce the Shariah as the Law of the Land. The Law of Taaghoot is the supreme law of NaPakistan (the Impure Land). And, about this kufr law, the Qur'aan Majeed states:
"Whoever does not adjudicate according to that (Law) which Allah has revealed, verily they are indeed kaafiroon." (Al-Maaidah, Aayat 44)
"Whoever does not adjudicate according to that (Law) which Allah has revealed, verily they are zaalimoon" ( Al-Maaidah, Aayat 45)
"Whoever does not adjudicate according to that (Law) which Allah has revealed, verily they are faasiqoon." (Al-Maaidah, Aayat 47)
Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, in a broadcast to the people of the United Sates in 1948, said:
"I do not know what the ultimate shape of this constitution is going to be, but I am sure that it will be a democratic type, embodying the essential principles of Islam…… Islam and its idealism have taught us democracy……
In any case Pakistan is not going to be a theocratic state - to be ruled by priests with a divine mission. We have many non-Muslims –Hindus, Christians and Parsis – but they are all Pakistanis. They will enjoy the same rights and privileges as any other citizens and will play their rightful part in the affairs of Pakistan."
The Munaafiq made it abundantly clear that Pakistan would not become a Shariah (theocratic) state. It will be a kuffaar western-type democratic state.
Whatever, he had disgorged is the antithesis of the Shariah. His statement pertaining to "the essential principles of Islam" is zukhruful qawl of Iblees to beguile simple and moron molvis and ignorant Muslims – to dupe them into believing that Islam will be Law of the land. But, the 80 year history of Pakistan has confirmed that Islam never was the Law of the country. On the contrary it is the law of Taghoot (western democracy - kufr democracy - shaitaani democracy) which has all along governed this miserable, unfortunate, Napakistan. It was never formed for promoting Islam – the Shariah and the Sunnah.
"Cease to be Muslims"
Brazenly stating his kufr ideology, Jinnah said:
"We are starting with this fundamental principle that we are all citizens of one state…. I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the state."
Stark KUFR! Blatant KUFR! Mincing his words to deceive, the miserable architect of Napakistan was simply spewing zukhruful qawl urinated into his brains by Iblees. The deception of this adorned inspiration of Iblees has blinded the spiritual vision of the 1,800 scholars who have miserably failed to distinguish between the demands of Imaan and the Kufr snare of Iblees.
However can it be possible for Muslims to "cease being Muslims politically" when every aspect of the Shariah is inextricably interwoven with Imaan. It is not possible to excise any sphere of life from the Shariah. Being 'Muslim' in one's private capacity, that is, the restriction of Islam to ritual acts of worship, and being kaafir (ceasing to being Muslim) in the political dimension, is KUFR which expels one from the fold of Islam. Allah Ta'ala states in the Qur'aan Majeed:
"What! Do you believe in part of the Kitaab and reject a part? The punishment of those from you who do so, is disgrace in this worldly life, and on the Day of Qiyaamah they shall be assigned to the severest punishment."
(Al-Baqarah, Aayat 85)
"O People of Imaan! Enter into Islam fully (completely), and do not follow in the footsteps of shaitaan, for verily he is for you an open enemy."
(Al-Baqarah, Aayat 208)
When some Muslims who had converted from Judaism desired to practice some Jewish customs, this Aayat was revealed. In the same style of partial acceptance of Islam, did the Jinnah chap envisage an 'islam' divested of its political dimension. He was deceptively coating kufr democracy – the rule of Taaghoot - with some Islamic hues which just could not stick on his kufr model. Never ever can the Mu'mineen "cease to be Muslim" in any aspect and sphere of life. Deleting any aspect of the Shariah is kufr.
A theocratic state?
"At a press conference, Jinnah was asked: "Will Pakistan be a secular or theocratic state". Jinnah responded: "You are asking me a question that is absurd. I do not know what a theocratic state means."
Yes, he did not know what a Shariah state is because he was a kaafir of the Munaafiq order.
- Source
- themajlis.co.za
- Published in
- Al-Haq Bulletin No. 81
- PDF page
- 8