The Majlis Archive
Nikah (Marriage) - Talaaq (Divorce) The Majlis Vol 26 No 03, p.6

I am faced with a dilemma and I‟m hoping for your esteemed advice.

Question

I am faced with a dilemma and I‟m hoping for your esteemed advice. In today‟s day and age we hear from many Ulama that newly wed couples should stay separate from the husband‟s parents. In our economically depressed country, what happens to youth who are newly graduated and just started working? Starting salaries are ridiculously low in our economy today. What happens to young men such as myself? Young men who recently graduated, earning around R7000 as a starting salary in a company that increases salaries by a measly 8% a year and whose families can not afford to support a second household? And the only way to make Nikaah is to stay with my parents for the first few years? To wait to earn a salary that is enough for a separate house will take many many years. Are we advised and expected to wait until then to make Nikaah?

Answer

The Shariah has granted a woman the right to have her own private quarters to live where her in-laws may not intrude without her permission. Most in-laws labour under the impression that a daughter-in-law is a free maid. Innumerable marriages collapse and end in divorce due to incompatibility, dispute and enmity between the daughter-inlaw and her mother-inlaw.

If a woman is not prepared to marry a man who is unable to provide her a separate home, then no one can force her to marry that man. If she is agreeable to live with her in-laws, it is her choice. Hence, the issue is with the woman. If she insists on living separately, no one can compel her to stay with her in-laws.

Regardless of your urgent need to get married, you do not have the right nor the authority to demand that the woman lives with your parents, if she refuses. There is no one who can compel her. Such compulsion is haraam.

There is nothing the Ulama can do. They can not compel a woman to marry a man who is unable to provide her a separate home. If she of her own accord agrees to live with the in-laws, it is her own choice. If the woman is not prepared to live with her in-laws, she will be within the ambit of the Shariah. This is an issue which has to be decided between the parties before marriage. Whether to marry a man who is unable to provide a separate home or not to marry him, is the woman‟s choice and right. No one can pressurize her to accept living with her in-laws. Such pressure is zulm.

Allah Ta‟ala knows why He has granted her this right. In the vast majority of cases, mothers-in -law and even sisters-inlaw subject the daughterin-law to a reign of tyranny. Her life is regimented in her husband‟s house. She can not claim that the house where she has to live is her home. Her freedom is vastly curtailed and tasks of others are imposed on her. The mother-in-law, like a hawk watches how she cooks, dresses, and packs her kitchen and bedroom cupboards. Her life becomes miserable under the dictation and domination of her in-laws. That is why Allah Ta‟ala has bestowed to her the right of a separate home, entry into which may not be gained by the in-laws without her permission. Intrusion into her privacy is standard procedure in most homes where the daughter-in-law has to live with her in-laws.

MOLVI

SHENANIGANS

Commenting on the attitude of Molvis, Hadhrat Maulana Masihullah (Rahmatullah alayh) said: "Hadhrat Waalah (i.e. Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi -Rahmatullah alayhi) had said on the basis of experience that Molvis should not be hastily accepted in Bay‟t because they speak deceptively (with forked tongues)."

VACCINATION SATANISM

World Council for Health Calls for an Immediate Stop to the Covid-19 Experimental "Vaccines"

A. CONSENSUS OF WORLD'S FORE- MOST EXPERTS

Globally renowned experts, including Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, Prof. Dolores Cahill, and Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi, Ryan Cole, Richard Fleming, Robert W. Malone, Peter McCullough, Mark Trozzi, Michael Yeadon, Wolfgang Wodarg, and Vladimir Zelenko, among many others, consistently warn the world about the adverse effects resulting from Covid-19 experimental injections; they also warn about their long term effects, which cannot be known at this time since most clinical trials will be not completed until 2023, and some as late as 2025.

In June 2021, Dr. Tess Lawrie, co-founder of the World Council for Health and member of the Council‟s Steering Committee, courageously described the global crisis and called for urgent action: "There is now more than enough evidence on the [UK] Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans. Preparation should be made to scale up humanitarian efforts to assist those harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term effects."

B. DECLARATION

The World Council for Health declares that it is time to put an end to this humanitarian crisis. Further, the Council also declares that any direct or indirect involvement in the manufacturing, distribution, administration and promotion of these injections violates basic principles of common law, constitutional law and natural justice, as well as the Nuremberg Code, the Helsinki Declaration, and other international treaties.

C. UNCENSORED

FACTS

We now know that children are over one hundred times more likely to die from these experimental injections than Covid-19. Injected athletes, globally, are collapsing before our very eyes. In spite of the fact that reporting systems are limited and passive, millions of adverse effects have been recorded, which include death, paralysis, blood clots, strokes, myocarditis, pericarditis, heart attacks, spontaneous miscarriage, chronic fatigue and extreme depression.

See: coronavirusyellowcard.mhra.gov.uk

See: vaers.hhs.gov See: ema.europa.eu/en/ human-regulatory/ researchdevelopment/ pharmacovigilance/ eudravigilance

See: vigiaccess.org (search covid-19 vaccine) D. VICTIM TESTIMO- NIES

The World Council for Health acknowledges and respects the experiences and testimony of the victims of this worldwide medical experiment. We also declare and confirm that safe, effective and affordable treatments for Covid-19 exist and should be made available to all who need them.

See: wewanttobeheard.com

See: nomoresilence.world See: vaxtestimonies.org/ en

E. NOT SAFE, NOT

EFFECTIVE

Recent studies confirm the risks associated with Covid-19 experimental injections. Emerging research establishes that the injections are neither safe nor effective, and, in fact, are toxic. While some of the known ingredients of the injections cause biological harm, it is even more concerning that the unknown and undisclosed ingredients may present an even greater threat to human health.

F. CEASE AND

DESIST

The World Council for Health is ethically and lawfully bound to issue this Declaration, demanding that governments and corporations cease and desist from direct or indirect participation in the manufacturing, distribution, administration or promotion of Covid-19 experimental injections.

The Council declares that every living man and woman has a moral and legal duty to take immediate and decisive action to halt this unprecedented medical experiment, which continues to cause

unnecessary and immeasurable harm.

G. NOTICE OF

LIABILITY

The right of bodily integrity and the right to informed consent are inalienable and universal human rights, which have been trampled by government mandates and corporate imperatives. Thus, the World Council for Health declares that any person or organization directly or indirectly participating in the manufacturing, distribution, administration or promotion of Covid-19 experimental biologics will be held liable for the violation of principles of justice grounded in civil, criminal, constitutional and natural law, as well as international treaties.

About the signatories

We are your World Council for Health

This declaration was created and signed by doctors, lawyers, and others assisting to steer the newly formed World Council for Health

About Us

World Council for

Health

Signed November 29,

2021

Charles Kovess

Dr. Jennifer Hibberd

Dr. Naseeba Kathrada

Dr. Robert J McLeod

Dr. Vince Vicente

Dr. Tess Lawrie

Dr. Mark Trozzi

Dr. Maria Hubmer Mogg

Michael Alexander Dr. Tracy Chandler Dr. Zac Cox

Dr. Stephan Becker Karen McKenna

Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

Download issue PDF EPUB
Published in
The Majlis Vol 26 No 03
PDF page
6

Verbatim verified against the source PDF

Appears under THE KUFR OF CONTAGION. This heading is the nearest headline at or before the page and is approximate. Do not cite it alone.

Was this page helpful?