Part Two
THE ‘SEERAH’ JALSAH FALSEHOOD OF REVEREND ABRAHAM BHAM
DELIBERATE DISTORTION COMPOUNDED WITH DECEPTION TO VINDICATE HIS KUFR INTER-FAITH DALLIANCE
“DO NOT CONFUSE THE HAQQ WITH BAATIL (DELIBERATELY) WHILST YOUR ARE AWARE (OF THE TRUTH).” (Al Baqarah, Aayat 42)
The Reverend of the Cross, the Cross-Worshipping reverend Abraham Bham of the NNB jamiat of Fordsburg, in his narrative of baatil at his so-called ‘seerah jalsah’ mentioned the acceptance of Islam by Thammaamah Ibn Uthaal (Radhiyallahu anhu) who had accepted Islam after having observed the conduct of the Muslims for three days. Utilizing this incident cunningly and stupidly to justify his participation in the kufr interfaith satanism, said:
“I wonder today if people had to see our conduct, will they be inclined to Islam or will they turn away from Islam. Unfortunately we will say, we don’t present a good advertisement of the religion the way we carry on.”
While this averment is 100% correct, the copro-cross-worshipper misdirects it. While the statement applies to today’s Ummah as a whole, the fellow refers it to the Ulama-e-Haqq who are defending the Deen of Allah Ta’ala with their Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahy Anil Munkar. Most assuredly, the kuffaar do not see true Islam in the conduct of today’s Ummah. Consider the haraam, kufr conduct of this miserable reverend of the Cross.
When the kuffaar look at him, they see no difference between his conduct and their conduct. Thus, the brand of ‘islam’ they see on him is meaningless for them. If they look at the Ummah as a whole, they see only the very same evils in which they (the kuffaar) are embroiled. They see no difference. Thus, there is no attraction for them in the conduct of today’s Ummah.
On the other hand, intelligent sincere kuffaar whose hearts have not been corrupted with moral filth, are automatically drawn to Islam, not by the conduct of today’s Muslims, but by what they read of orthodox Islam – of the true Sunnah. We can present numerous such examples of people who entered into the fold of Islam.
Explaining one such episode, Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thaanvi narrated about an Englishman who had embraced Islam. Once he was making wudhu at the Haudh (Pond) in Jaami’ Musjid in Delhi. He observed that the gutter of the haudh was filthy and slimy. When he commented on the impropriety of the filthy gutter, some ignorant Muslims shrugged him off by commenting something to the effect that since he was a westerner, he was speaking drivel. An intelligent Muslim who had witnessed this incident, seeking to assuage the Englishman, said: “Ignore them. They are ignorant.” The English Muslim said: “Don’t worry. I did not accept Islam on seeing the conduct of Muslims. I accepted Islam intelligently (i.e. after studying and being convinced of its truth).”
Reverend Abraham Bham has nothing of Islam to offer. Intelligent kuffaar for whom Allah Ta’ala may have decreed Hidaayat are able to discern the artificial brand of ‘islam’ which this miserable Mudhil represents. They understand that he is bereft of principles and that he compromises with falsehood, and such evil conduct is displayed by persons whose objective is the jeefah (carrion) of this dunya. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “The dunya is jeefah.”
Under cover of the word ‘seerah’, the Cross-Worshipper seeking to promote his interfaith kufr agenda, said:
“Now what we learn from here, 110 delegations, we learn: lessons of diplomacy, lessons of interaction…lessons of the broadmindedness of Nabi-e-Kareem Sallallahu alayhi wasallam)…”
In this copro-averment, the misguided character who has betrayed Islam and the Ummah, is abortively struggling to substantiate his involvement with the kufr interfaith movement. This is a movement of the enemies of Islam designed for the elimination of Islam. Perpetrating blatant misinterpretation of the Ahaadith, he presents a total distortion of the reality of the nature of the interaction of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) with the kuffaar delegations.
Such kufr distortion is highlighted in his explanation of the Najraani Christian delegation. We have debunked his falsehood and distortion in Part One of this series of Refutation. His distortion consists of blatant LIES which he brazenly proffers, banking on the ignorance of the audience.
Briefly, there is nothing, absolutely nothing, in the conduct of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and in his interaction with the delegations to produce as support for participation in a satanic ideology which the Message of Tawheed came to demolish. There is nothing in the Seerat of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) which could be interpreted as a compromise with kufr and baatil.
How could this ever be possible, when Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) declared to the interfaithers of his era:
Even if you put the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left hand, I shall not desist from proclaiming Tawheed, etc., etc.
There is nothing in the noble Seerat of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) which lends support for the dilution of Islam by means of such ‘interaction’ which leads to elevating the kufr religions and ideologies to the pedestal of Islam. Allah Ta’ala declares with emphasis in His Qur’aan Majeed: “The Deen by Allah is only Islam.” Any diluted version is KUFR.
The ‘broadmindedness’ of Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) never led to compromise with the kufr of the delegations. It did not produce any synthesis between Islam and shirk and kufr. On the contrary, the ‘broadmindedness’ constrained Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to declare to the delegations:
“It is either Islam or the Sword.”
The Hukm of even Jizyah no longer applied to the Yahood and Nasaara who at that time were inhabitants of Arabia. For them, applied the Command which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) stated on his Deathbed:
“Expel the Yahood and Nasaara from Jazeeratul Arab.”
This clinches the argument. This knocks out the bottom from the Cross-Worshipper’s ideology of diluting Islam by means of displaying kufr ‘good conduct’ to the kuffaar. During the Khilaafat of Ameerul Mu’min Umar Ibn Khattaab (Radhiyallahu anhu) all the Yahood and Nasaara were expelled from the Arabian Peninsula. What type of ‘diplomacy’ was this? The type of ‘diplomacy’ advocated by the Bham Cross-Worshipper is the prelude for embracing KUFR.
The lesson we learn from the manner in which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had conducted himself with the kuffaar delegations is the presentation of unadulterated Islam; that we should not compromise the Haqq; that the kuffaar should not be kept in the dark regarding their kufr beliefs. That is why Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said to the Najraani delegation:
“You have spoken a lie. Three things impede you from accepting Islam: Worshipping the cross; devouring the flesh of swines, and believing that Isaa (Alayhis salaam) is the son of Allah.”
Yes, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Proclaim the Haqq even though it is bitter.” This is of the traits of the Uswah Hasanah (Beautiful Conduct) of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) which we espouse and fight for.
(To be continued in Part Three, Insha-Allah)
16 Rajab 1444 – 7 February 2023