Part Three THE KNB (KUFR NIKAH BILL)
GANIEF HENDRICK’S DESPERATE CLUTCHING AT STRAWS
REMINDER
Before continuing with our demolition of the insipid, stupid drivel proffered by Mr.Ganief Hendricks in his clutching at straws attempt to divert focus from the subject under discussion, it is proper to remind readers what exactly is the issue underlying our current dispute with Hendricks. He had very boldly claimed:
- That the government has recognized Shariah Law.
- That henceforth the consequences of Muslim Marriages would be Shariah consequences.
- That The Majlis had submitted an interfaith marriage Bill, yet we oppose others who author such bills.
Mr.Ganief Hendricks in another red herring stunt says in his drivel essay:
“After Zuma left office and was replaced by Ramaphosa, there was an automatic marriage policy change; instead of having multiple ones, the ANC proposed a One Statute Marriage Bill. The latter basically shelved all the old and new Marriage Act proposals. Amidst this, a Constitutional Court judgement also gave Members of Parliament (such as Al-Jama-ah Party) the same rights as governing party to introduce Private Members Biils (PMB)”
What is the relationship between his acquisition of ‘rights’ from a kuffaar entity to participate in the kufr process of fabricating kufr laws, and his false claim of the government having recognized Shariah Law? In which way does this rubbish constitute evidence for his claims mentioned in the Reminder above?
At no stage did we concern ourselves with the bunkum he mentions. Our one and only contention was and is that the claims he had excreted are false, and it devolves on him to either prove the claims or retract same. Beating about the bush does not bail him out from the morass of falsehood in which he finds himself trapped and stagnated.
Mr.Hendricks further alleges:
“During December 2021, the ConCourt judgment recognized ‘a Shariah marriage; as a valid South African marriage. While case law is part of South African Law along with parliamentary legislation, this specific judgement cannot be overturned, as it was issued by the highest court in the land.”
This is not evidence for his false claims. The concourt’s ruling is devoid of Shar’i substance. The concourt’s ruling while being part of the kufr law of South Africa, is NEVER part of the Shariah.
The recognition by the concourt is not a recognition of Shariah Law. It merely says that the marriage has legal validity in kufr law without accepting the legal consequences of the Shar’i Nikah. On the contrary, the kuffaar court attaches all kufr consequences to the hallucinated ‘shariah law marriage’. Not a single Shar’i consequence of Nikah and Talaaq is accepted by the concourt and the government.
What type of ‘recognition’ is it which denies all the consequences of a Shar’i Nikah? While the hallucination of this baseless ‘recognition’ is something for Ganief to cackle about, it is rejected by the Shariah.
The ‘specific’ law mentioned above is in reality zulm on a husband who wants Shariah consequences which are abhorred by the murtaddah ex-wife whom Ganief and the kuffaar court support. The woman who has bartered away her Imaan demands kufr consequences, not Shariah consequences because the Law of Allah Ta’ala does not appeal to her. Kufr law is a convenient tool for the usurpation of haraam monetary gain from the ex-husband.
The above is merely a digression from the actual subject matter which the Jahannam party is desperate to sweep under the carpet. But, this fellow will not be allowed to escape with his false claims. The government has not recognized Shariah law. The claim to the contrary made by Hendricks is a canard – a dastardly one.
The lost soul also mentions other concourt rulings in his futile bid to detract from the subject of dispute and to obfuscate the issue. But he will not succeed. He has to provide the proof for his falsehood or retract.
Presenting another absolutely flaccid and an unrelated piece of drivel, Ganief says:
“The Marriage Act 25 of 1961 (Marriage Act) and the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 (Divorce Act) are declared to be inconsistent with sections 9, 10, 28 and 34 of the Constitution in that they fail to recognise marriages solemnised in accordance with Sharia law (Muslim marriages) which have not been registered as civil marriages, as valid marriages for all purposes in South Africa, and to regulate the consequences of such recognition.”
This piece of drivel does not bolster the baseless claim, namely, that the government has recognized Shariah Law. It is indeed a manifestation of sheer ignorance to believe that the concourt’s declaration means recognition of Shariah Law. Mr.Hendricks does not have the haziest idea of the meaning of ‘Shariah Law’, hence he has made his ludicrous claim. If he had even a semblance of understanding of the Concept of Shariah Law, he would not have belittled and disgraced himself with the gaff of ‘shariah law’.
While the concourt has declared the kufr Marriage Act and the kufr Divorce Act to be inconsistent with the kufr constitution, the Shariah declares the whole of the constitution and Ganief’s silly marriage bill inconsistent with the Shariah, hence totally invalid. This declaration of the concourt does NOT recognize Shariah Law. It merely says that Muslim marriages are legal in terms of kufr law, hence all the kufr consequences applicable to kuffaar marriages will henceforth apply to Muslim marriages.
The Shariah consequences of a Nikah are NOT recognized, and do not come within the purview of the ‘inconsistency’ decree of the concourt. While Hendricks does understand this fact, he seeks to deceptively peddle the idea that this ruling of the concourt has conferred recognition to the Shar’i consequences of Islamic marriages. But this is furthest from the truth. It is a canard. It is glaringly false. Its falsity will by-pass only one whose brains have exploded in cognitive dissonance. The smokescreen tactics of Hendricks do not befool Muslims. They are limited to his own self-deception, snugly believing that he has managed to convince Muslims that the government has recognized Shariah Law. What a silly, ridiculous notion!!!
In another red herring designed to divert the focus from the subject matter of the dispute, and to obfuscate the issue, Hendricks makes the following flapdoodle disgorgement:
“Allow me to briefly re-state that Government’s policy is to have a One Marriage Act for South Africa; this Act should largely register all marital relationships in the country. This Act must also comply with South Africa’s international to combat human trafficking which happens in South Africa daily. In this regard, young girls – very young Muslim teenagers – are married off to strangers without their legal consent. South Africa, being an unequal society, is also faced with the rise in Gender Based Violence (GBV); on top of this, several South African Muslim wives are told by some members of the Muslim theological bodies to accept physical and emotional abuse without considering taking the issue to court.
He has merely sniffed around in the futile attempt to find ‘evidence’ for his absolutely baseless and misleading narrative of ‘recognition of Shariah Law by the government.’ Nothing in this averment has any bearing on the Issue which has constrained our exercise of excoriating this fellow of the baatil in which he revels.
Mr.Hendricks! From the heights of your hubris, you have ignored or are ignorant of the Facts and Demands of the Shariah.
For your edification – perhaps it is not even possible – the Shariah is the Qur’aan and the Sunnah, NOT the kufr decrees of the kufr concourt. The government’s policies and the laws enacted by the kufr parliament with which you are now philandering because you have discarded your Imaan to be one of them, are all artefacts of Taaghoot Law which you are promoting in the name of the Shariah of which your understanding is lamentably scandalous as is evidenced from the deluge of drivel you proffer in your futile vindication of haraam and kufr.
Suffice to say, that the aforegoing averment has no relevance to the matter we are discussing and disputing. It is simply some dust kicked up by Ganief to conceal the reality in a haze of deception.
TO CONTINUE IN OUR NEXT INSTALMENT, INSHA-ALLAH
==========———-==========
IT IS HARAAM TO VOTE FOR AL JAHANNAM PARTY. IT IS HARAAM TO PARTICIPATE IN KUFFAAR POLITICS. KUFFAAR LAW IS TAAGHOOT LAW. THOSE WHO JOIN THE KUFFAAR LAW-MAKING PROCESS, ARE AGENTS OF TAAGHOOT. ABOUT THE SLAVES OF TAAGHOOT, THE QUR’AAN MAJEED STATES:
“….They (run) to Taaghoot (Iblees) intending to seek adjudication (from shaitaan) whilst they have been commanded to reject him. And shaitaan intends to cast them into manifest deviation.” (An-Nisaa’, Aayat 60)
“Those (such as these so-called ‘muslim’ politicians) who do not decide according to that (Law –the Shariah) revealed by Allah, indeed they are the kaafiroon.” (Al-Maaidah, Aayat 44)
19 Jamaadith Thaani 1444 – 12 January 2023