TAILLESS SHEEP
ACCEPTING THE RUBBISH ARGUMENT IS KUFR
It is KUFR because it implies that Allah Azza Wa Jal had created tails for sheep in idle sport or without purpose. Muslims groping in the darkness of kufr culture and suffering from gross mental inferiority simply bootlick and swallow whatever rubbish some kuffaar farmers say on the issue of docking the tails of sheep. But, even the atheist experts criticizing tail-docking say:
“Sheep have tails for a reason: tails help protect the anus, vulva and udder. A tail can be shaken to deter flies or to scatter faeces.” (A Greener World – AGW)
A genuine Muslim is not in need of the reasons proffered by the kuffaar experts for understanding Divine Wisdom underlying the creation of every organ and every facet in every species of creation. It is abhorrent to Imaan to believe that Allah Ta’ala had created tails for sheep without purpose. It is extremely vile and KUFR to believe that what the kuffaar farmers say is correct and that their claims supersede the Purpose for which Allah Azza Wa Jal had bestowed the bounty of tails to sheep.
Since the bootlicking molvis and moron Muslim masses hold in awe the views of the atheists and kuffaar scientists, we present here for their mental digestion the findings of the atheist experts. The certified Anima Welfare Approved by a Greener World (AGW), says:
“Tail docking is carried out by using rubber rings, emasculators or, in some instances, a scalpel. In the last 10 years, researchers have clearly demonstrated that tail docking causes significant pain and distress to lambs – regardless of the technique used or the age of the lambs (see Grant 2004; Kent et al 2001).
Researchers have also identified other problems associated with tail docking. For example, scientists have shown that docking too short – as is often practiced with show sheep – can increase the risk of rectal prolapse. Thomas et al (2003) found that short docked lambs had a higher incidence of rectal prolapse (7.8%) than lambs with a medium (4.0%) or long (1.8%) dock. Fisher and Gregory (2007) found that shorter tail docking resulted in significantly lighter recto-cooccygeal muscles, which potentially increases the risk of prolapse. In addition, they found that the tail stumps of half of the no-tail, short and medium docked lambs showed signs of neuroma development and degenerative nerve changes – yet only a few of the long docked lambs showed this. Neromas are swollen bundles of nerve fibers which can persist indefinitely, causing pain even after the docked tail appears totally healed. In the second part of their 2007 study, Fisher and Gregory also showed that pain and distress was more pronounced the shorter the tail was docked.
Other researchers found that the complete removal of the tail actually increased the incidence fly strike compared with lambs that were docked but had some tail remaining (Watts and Marchant 1977; Watts and Luff 1978). This mirrors earlier work from Australia, as reviewed in Fisher et al (2004), which reports that up to 55–60% of no-tail and short docked sheep showed signs of fly strike, compared to up to 32% of medium tail docked sheep. The same review reports that cancer of the perineal region – usually the vulva – and tail infection were far higher in short tail docked sheep and almost non-existent in medium or long docked sheep. It is thought that the ability of a lamb to shake its (undocked) tail can help minimize fly strike by deterring flies from landing, while also helping to spread and scatter its feces.”
Muslims, especially the juhala molvis, should hang their heads in shame for their disgusting opinion which is a slanderous implication against Allah Azza Wal, namely, that Allah Ta’ala has created tails for sheep without purpose.
QUR’BAAN OF TAILLESS SHEEP IS NOT VALID. DO NOT FALL IN THE TRAP OF THE SATANIC FATWAS OF MOLVIS WHO ISSUE FATWAS TO GAIN THE FAVOUR OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ADDICTED TO SHEEP-MUTTON, AND FOR WHICH PURPOSE THEY ARE MAKING ‘qurbaani’.
THE QUR’BAANI MADE MERELY FOR CONSUMING MEAT IS NOT VALID.
SPECIAL NASEEHAT FOR THE MOLVIS
“The (physical) eyes are not blind. But (in reality) blind are the hearts within the breasts.” (Al-An’aam, Aayat 103)
The corrupt ‘fatwa’ of permissibility of offering tailless sheep for Qur’baani is an implied buhtaan directed against Allah Azza Wa Jal. They are implying that Allah Ta’ala create tails for sheep without purpose, and that the view of the kuffaar farmers justifies the cancellation of the Mas’alah. And they also imply that the baatil/kufr view of the kuffaar supersedes the Divine Purpose underlying the creation of tails for sheep.
It is on this kufr basis that molvis are appeasing those who are addicted to only sheep mutton. Despite goats with tails available in abundance, they insist on sheep regardless of the tails having been docked. The reason is nothing other than meat consumption. They have no liking for goat meat. But they conveniently forget that the objective of Qur’baani is not meat consumption despite the permissibility to consume.
Thus, in the Math-hab of the Ahlullaah whom the Ulama are supposed to follow, they should repent – make Taubah and also renew their Imaan for having unintentionally slandered Allah Azza Wa Jal. This issue should not be viewed obliquely through the spectacles of Fiqh. The following episode should serve as an eye-opener and a brain-opener to understand the need for Taubah and renewal of Imaan.
Once Hadhrat Imaam Shaafi (rahmatullah alayh) and Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hambal (rahmatullah alayh) met. While they were conversing, Habib Ajmi (rahmatullah alayh) appeared on the scene. Imaam Ahmad said to Imaam Shaafi: “I shall ask him something.” Although Imaam Shaafi discouraged Imaam Ahmad, the latter asked Habib Ajmi: “If a person has missed one of the five Salaats (and cannot recall which one), what should he do?”
Habib Ajmi: “He should repeat all five Salaat because he was forgetful and disrespectful to Allah Ta’ala.”
This answer shocked Imaam Ahmad (Rahmatullah alayh) so much that he fell down unconscious. Later when he regained consciousness, Imaam Shaafi’ (Rahmatullah alayh) said to him: “I told you not to question him. These people who have reached Allah Ta’ala have a different approach.”
Now why did Imaam Ahmad Bin Hambal (Rahmatullah alayh) drop down unconscious? It was because his Baatini (Spiritual Eyes) were not blind as mentioned in the aforementioned Qur’aanic Aayat. Despite being one of the great and illustrious Aimmah Mujtahideen, Imaam Ahmad did not scale the Response of Hadhrat Habib Ajmi (Rahmatullah alayh) on the principles of Fiqh.
The Response pierced his Baatin (Spiritual Heart) like an arrow. He understood from the Response what molvis with blinded eyes cannot understand, hence the unconsciousness. If the molvis at least apply their brains correctly, and with Ikhlaas, they will then refrain from philandering with the desires of the juhala for appeasing them. Then their fatwas will not be the effects of cognitive dissonance which yields damnable lies and slander even against Allah Azza Wa Jal. Even though their slander is unintentional, the outward form of their cognitive acquittal appears as gargantuan hypocrisy. The fatwa of permissibility regarding making Qur’baani of tailless animals is issued not to gain the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala, but is designed and crafted for the pleasure of the Juhala.
6 Zul Hijjah 1443 – 6 July 2022