Question
According to the lawyer, Mr. M. S. Omar, the view of a legal person and the view of the permissibility of transferring haraam money to a Waqf and its changing character therein are views expressed by Mufti Taqi and other senior Ulama. Please comment.
Answer
We are not the muqallideen of Mufti Taqi or of the other contemporary senior Ulama. We are the Muqallideen of Imaam Abu Hanifah (rahmatullah alayh). Mufti Taqi’s view is his personal opinion unsubstantiated by Shar’i dalai-il. Such opinion is devoid of Shar’i standing and substance. We reiterate that:
(1) A ‘legal person’ is a legal donkey. It is a fictitious donkey fabricated by capitalism to rob and fraud. There is no concept in Islam such as a legal entity or a legal donkey. A fiction has no reality in the Shariah.
(2) A Waqf and a Musjid are not legal donkeys. A Musjid building cannot own anything. A stone has no rights and obligations, and no powers of contracting as the neo-capitalists and slaves of the west propound. The Ulama who propagate these ugly and stupid theories of capitalism have lost their Islamic mental equilibrium. Their minds have become liberalized as a consequence of western mental colonization, hence they blurt out stupid drivel – drivel such as a legal donkey and drivel such as haraam money becoming halaal if handed to a Musjid/Waqf. Their thinking is indeed putrid and despicable.
The Hadith states very clearly that Allah Ta’ala does not accept haraam. Ye
- Source
- themajlis.co.za
- Published in
- themajlis.co.za Q&A
Not verbatim-checked against a source PDF