Please explain the following Hadith.

Answer

Denying / rejecting Hadith is a glaring rejection of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Such munaafiqeen do not believe that Muhammad (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was the Rasool of Allah Ta'ala. How is it possible to accept that a person is a Nabi of Allah Ta'ala, but to deny his statements and teachings? Absolute morons of the deviate modernist kind of munaafiqeen are in denial of the validity of Hadith. They reject Ahaadith because they are not Muslims. They are pure, unadulterated Munaafiqeen. Only munaafiqeen who profess to be Muslims do not perform Salaat, do not make wudhu nor ghusl nor pay Zakaat, nor practice the numerous other injunctions of the Shariah which are ALL based on and substantiated by the Hadith, and not to be found between the Two Covers.

Minus Hadith there is NO Qur'aan and NO Islam. Firstly these morons fail to understand their own ignorance and stupidity in citing the aforementioned Hadith to bolster their rotten kufr. When they are in denial of Hadith, the stupidity of citing Hadith to substantiate their kufr claim is glaringly conspicuous. The narration they have cited from Bukhaari is a Hadith. Now when even the statements of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are rejected and denounced by these modernist munaafiqeen, then they merely advertise their stark jahaalat by citing such a Hadith which is not even the statement of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

It is a self-evident fact that these scoundrel deniers of Hadith do not perform Salaat because in terms of their kufr belief Hadith is unacceptable. The Qur'aan Majeed is silent regarding the five Fardh Salaat, the number of Fardh and Sunnat raka'ts, the method of performing Salaat and the innumerable masaa-il pertaining to Salaat. So on what basis can they perform Salaat? If they do perform Salaat, it will be a show based on their Nifaaq.

If the details of Islam are only restricted to what appears in the Qur'aan Majeed then these modernist rubbishes are in flagrant denial of thousands of Shar'i masaa-il and numerous practices which they themselves practice to dupe Muslims and to ostensibly portray themselves as Muslims. They should state boldly and with clarity that they do not believe that:

* There are Five Fardh daily Salaat

* Fajr has two Fardh raka'ts, Zuhr 4, Asr 4, Maghrib 3 and Isha 4

* There are Sunnatul Muakkadah and Sunnatul Ghair Muakkadah raka'ts attached to the Five Fardh Salaat

* That Jumuah Salaat has two Fardh and ten Sunnatul Muakkadah raka'ts

* That Jumuah consists of two Khutbahs

* That 2.5% of one's wealth has to be paid as Zakaat

* That Muslims should be buried in the style the Ummah has been burying its dead.

* That they do not believe in the innumerable masaa -il pertaining to Zakaat, Hajj and all other facets of Islamic life.

In brief, these moron munaafiqeen must declare that by denying Hadith they are rejecting the entire Shariah – all the ahkaam of the Deen – which are not mentioned between the 'Two Covers' of the Qur'aan Majeed.

A Rubbish who denies Hadith, denies the whole of Islam, but due to cowardice and nifaaq he is too scared to publicly proclaim the kufr lurking in his heart.

Regarding the 'Two Covers' narration cited above, the moron munaafiqeen are too dense in their brains corrupted by Iblees to understand the purport of the Hadith which they abortively use and misinterpret in a futile, flapdoodle attempt to bolster their nifaaq theory. All Muslims believe that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) propagated nothing other than the Qur'aan. Whatever he imparted is undoubtedly corroborated by whatever Allah Ta'ala says in the Qur'aan.

When Hadhrat Abdullah Ibn Mas'ood (Radhiyallahu anhu) mentioned the prohibition of joining hair by women, a woman asked for Qur'aanic proof. According to her this prohibition is not mentioned in the Qur'aan. Hadhrat Ibn Mas'ood (Radhiyallahu anhu) emphasized that it is in fact in the Qur'aan. Then in support of his contention he recited the Aayat: "Hold on firmly to whatever the Rasool has brought to you, and abstain from whatever he has forbidden to you."

Numerous Aayaat command: "Obey Allah and obey His Rasool….." What is the meaning of 'obeying the Rasool', and why does Allah Ta'ala in the Qur'aan Majeed equate obedience to the Rasool to His Obedience? If every detail of Islam was confined between the Two Covers of the Qur'aan, then what is the purport of ordering obedience to the Rasool? Obedience to Allah Ta'ala would have sufficed. Only confirmed Munaafiqeen will deny the irrefutable fact that innumerable actions and statements of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are not in the Qur'aan in explicit form. All of the teachings of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) come within the scope of the Aayaat commanding obedience to the Rasool (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

From this perspective, every teaching of the Rasool (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is between the 'Two Covers'. In this regard, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

"Behold! I have been given the Qur'aan and its Similarity with it. Behold! The time is near when (you will find) an obese (ugly and fat) man sitting on his couch saying: 'Make incumbent on you this Qur'aan. Whatever you find in it of halaal, accept it as halaal, and whatever you find in it of haraam, accept it as haraam.' "

Then Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) added to the above: "Verily, whatever Rasulullah has made haraam is like Allah has made it haraam."

Here Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) predicted about these Munaafiqeen who will deny Hadith and seek to legalize all their evil and haraam with their shaitaani stunt of denial of Hadith and proffering the stupid argument of such haraam and evil not being mentioned in the Qur'aan. But, the Qur'aan Majeed itself, commanding obedience to the Hadith states:

"Fight (wage Jihad) against those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, nor do they regard as haraam whatever Allah and His Rasool has made haraam…" (At-Taubah, Aayat 29)

Whatever Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has made haraam has the same status as prohibitions which are directly attributed to Allah Ta'ala in the Qur'aan Majeed. The stupidity and corruption of the brains of these shaitaani deniers of Rasulullah's statements are indeed mindboggling. They only advertise their hidden kufr with their denial of the express teachings of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

That all the teachings, statements, tenets, etc. stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are between the Two Covers of the Qur'aan, are simple for the understanding of people of Imaan. Allah's command to obey Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is more than adequate for convincing the Mu'mineen that whatever he had said is undoubtedly the Command of Allah Ta'ala. Submitting to such commands is Allah's order stated in the Qur'aan. Thus, it is unadulterated KUFR to say that Fajr does not have two raka'ts Fardh because this is not expressly stated in the Qur'aan. The same applies to the thousands of other details of the Shariah which are substantiated by the actions and statements of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

The final nail in the coffin of the arguments of these deviated moron Munaafiqeen is the fact that they, like the Shiahs, do not believe in the Qur'aan which the Ahlus Sunnah believe to be the Word of Allah Ta'ala. If they claim to believe in the Qur'aan we believe in, then what is their daleel for claiming that this Qur'aan of the Ahlus Sunnah is in fact the Revelation of Allah Ta'ala? From whence did they acquire the notion that the Qur'aan of the Ahlus Sunnah is the Kalaam of Allah Azza Wa Jal when they reject all Ahaadith?

The Qur'aan being the Qur'aan is substantiated only on the basis of Hadith. There is absolutely no other way for believing that our Qur'aan is the Qur'aan revealed to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), without believing in Hadith. Jibraeel (Alayhis salaam) did not come to inform these moron deviates that this Qur'aan we have today is actually the revealed Qur'aan. Furthermore, the proofs for the Qur'aan being the Qur'aan of Allah Azza Wa Jal are not based on even the statements of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). All confirmation of the authenticity of the Qur'aan are on the basis of the statements of the Sahaabah, and all such statements are known as Hadith. Thus there is absolutely no validity in the kufr drivel these juhala disgorge.