Please explain the following Hadith.

Answer

Denying / rejecting Hadith is a glaring rejection of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Such munaafiqeen do not believe that Muhammad (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was the Rasool of Allah Ta‟ala. How is it possible to accept that a person is a Nabi of Allah Ta‟ala, but to deny his statements and teachings? Absolute morons of the deviate modernist kind of munaafiqeen are in denial of the validity of Hadith. They reject Ahaadith because they are not Muslims. They are pure, unadulterated Munaafiqeen. Only munaafiqeen who profess to be Muslims do not perform Salaat, do not make wudhu nor ghusl nor pay Zakaat, nor practice the numerous other injunctions of the Shariah which are ALL based on and substantiated by the Hadith, and not to be found between the Two Covers.

Minus Hadith there is NO Qur‟aan and NO Islam. Firstly these morons fail to understand their own ignorance and stupidity in citing the aforementioned Hadith to bolster their rotten kufr. When they are in denial of Hadith, the stupidity of citing Hadith to substantiate their kufr claim is glaringly conspicuous. The narration they have cited from Bukhaari is a Hadith. Now when even the statements of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are rejected and denounced by these modernist munaafiqeen, then they merely advertise their stark jahaalat by citing such a Hadith which is not even the statement of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

It is a self-evident fact that these scoundrel deniers of Hadith do not perform Salaat because in terms of their kufr belief Hadith is unacceptable. The Qur‟aan Majeed is silent regarding the five Fardh Salaat, the number of Fardh and Sunnat raka‟ts, the method of performing Salaat and the innumerable masaa-il pertaining to Salaat. So on what basis can they perform Salaat? If they do perform Salaat, it will be a show based on their Nifaaq.

If the details of Islam are only restricted to what appears in the Qur‟aan Majeed then these modernist rubbishes are in flagrant denial of thousands of Shar‟i masaa-il and numerous practices which they themselves practice to dupe Muslims and to ostensibly portray themselves as Muslims. They should state boldly and with clarity that they do not believe that:

* There are Five Fardh daily Salaat

* Fajr has two Fardh raka‟ts, Zuhr 4, Asr 4, Maghrib 3 and Isha 4

* There are Sunnatul Muakkadah and Sunnatul Ghair Muakkadah raka‟ts attached to the Five Fardh Salaat

* That Jumuah Salaat has two Fardh and ten Sunnatul Muakkadah raka‟ts * That Jumuah consists of two Khutbahs

* That 2.5% of one‟s wealth has to be paid as Zakaat

* That Muslims should be buried in the style the Ummah has been burying its dead.

* That they do not believe in the innumerable masaa -il pertaining to Zakaat, Hajj and all other facets of Islamic life.

In brief, these moron munaafiqeen must declare that by denying Hadith they are rejecting the entire Shariah - all the ahkaam of the Deen which are not mentioned between the „Two Covers‟ of the Qur‟aan Majeed.

A Rubbish who denies Hadith, denies the whole of Islam, but due to cowardice and nifaaq he is too scared to publicly proclaim the kufr lurking in his heart.

Regarding the „Two Covers‟ narration cited above, the moron munaafiqeen are too dense in their brains corrupted by Iblees to understand the purport of the Hadith which they abortively use and misinterpret in a futile, flapdoodle attempt to bolster their nifaaq theory. All Muslims believe that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) propagated nothing other than the Qur‟aan. Whatever he imparted is undoubtedly corroborated by whatever Allah Ta‟ala says in the Qur‟aan.

When Hadhrat Abdullah Ibn Mas‟ood (Radhiyallahu anhu) mentioned the prohibition of joining hair by women, a woman asked for Qur‟aanic proof. According to her this prohibition is not mentioned in the Qur‟aan. Hadhrat Ibn Mas‟ood (Radhiyallahu anhu) emphasized that it is in fact in the Qur‟aan. Then in support of his contention he recited the Aayat: "Hold on firmly to whatever the Rasool has brought to you, and abstain from whatever he has forbidden to you."

Numerous Aayaat command: "Obey Allah and obey His Rasool….." What is the meaning of „obeying the Rasool‟, and why does Allah Ta‟ala in the Qur‟aan Majeed equate obedience to the Rasool to His Obedience? If every detail of Islam was confined between the Two Covers of the Qur‟aan, then what is the purport of ordering obedience to the Rasool? Obedience to Allah Ta‟ala would have sufficed. Only confirmed Munaafiqeen will deny the irrefutable fact that innumerable actions and statements of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are not in the Qur‟aan in explicit form. All of the teachings of our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) come within the scope of the Aayaat commanding obedience to the Rasool (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

From this perspective, every teaching of the Rasool (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is between the „Two Covers‟. In this regard, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

"Behold! I have been given the Qur‟aan and its Similarity with it. Behold! The time is near when (you will find) an obese (ugly and fat) man sitting on his couch saying: „Make incumbent on you this Qur‟aan. Whatever you find in it of halaal, accept it as halaal, and whatever you find in it of haraam, accept it as haraam.‟ "

Then Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) added to the above: "Verily, whatever Rasulullah has made haraam is like Allah has made it haraam."

Here Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) predicted about these Munaafiqeen who will deny Hadith and seek to legalize all their evil and haraam with their shaitaani stunt of denial of Hadith and proffering the stupid argument of such haraam and evil not being mentioned in the Qur‟aan. But, the Qur‟aan Majeed itself, commanding obedience to the Hadith states: "Fight (wage Jihad) against those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, nor do they regard as haraam whatever

Allah and His Rasool has made haraam…" (At- Taubah, Aayat 29)

Whatever Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has made haraam has the same status as prohibitions which are directly attributed to Allah Ta‟ala in the Qur‟aan Majeed. The stupidity and corruption of the brains of these shaitaani deniers of Rasulullah‟s statements are indeed mindboggling. They only advertise their hidden kufr with their denial of the express teachings of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

That all the teachings, statements, tenets, etc. stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) are between the Two Covers of the Qur‟aan, are simple for the understanding of people of Imaan. Allah‟s command to obey Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is more than adequate for convincing the Mu‟mineen that whatever he had said is undoubtedly the Command of Allah Ta‟ala. Submitting to such commands is Allah‟s order stated in the Qur‟aan. Thus, it is unadulterated KUFR to say that Fajr does not have two raka‟ts Fardh because this is not expressly stated in the Qur‟aan. The same applies to the thousands of other details of the Shariah which are substantiated by the actions and statements of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

The final nail in the coffin of the arguments of these deviated moron Munaafiqeen is the fact that they, like the Shiahs, do not believe in the Qur‟aan which the Ahlus Sunnah believe to be the Word of Allah Ta‟ala. If they claim to believe in the Qur‟aan we believe in, then what is their daleel for claiming that this Qur‟aan of the Ahlus Sunnah is in fact the Revelation of Allah Ta‟ala? From whence did they acquire the notion that the Qur‟aan of the Ahlus Sunnah is the Kalaam of Allah Azza Wa Jal when they reject all Ahaadith?

The Qur‟aan being the Qur‟aan is substantiated only on the basis of Hadith. There is absolutely no other way for believing that our Qur‟aan is the Qur‟aan revealed to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), without believing in Hadith. Jibraeel (Alayhis salaam) did not come to inform these moron deviates that this Qur‟aan we have today is actually the revealed Qur‟aan. Furthermore, the proofs for the Qur‟aan being the Qur‟aan of Allah Azza Wa Jal are not based on even the statements of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). All confirmation of the authenticity of the Qur‟aan are on the basis of the statements of the Sahaabah, and all such statements are known as Hadith. Thus there is absolutely no validity in the kufr drivel these juhala disgorge.

(Arabic passage, page 10 of the original PDF)

HEARTS OF SWINES

Hadhrat Nabi Musaa (Alayhis salaam) said:

"(The ulama-e-soo‟) dress with the garb of Ruhbaan (Buzrugs/ Aabideen) whilst their hearts are the hearts of swines and predatory wolves. If you desire reaching the lofty spiritual stages of the heavens, then kill your hearts for the sake of Allah Ta‟ala." Commenting on this narration, Allaamah Najmuddin Al-Ghaziyy of the 10th Islamic century said: "Their hearts have been likened to the hearts of swines because of their overwhelming carnal lust. They traverse the precincts of halaal into haraam just as the lust of pigs dictates consumption of filth. Their hearts have been likened (also) to the hearts of wolves because of enmity, injustice and mischief."

Salubrious advice for

the ulama-e-soo‟.

KUFR AND

THE DOCTOR

When Hadhrat Abu Bakr Ayyaash (Rahmatullah alayh) was ill, a Christian doctor was brought to tend to him. Hadhrat Ayyaash resolutely prohibited the doctor from touching him.

As the doctor departed, Hadhrat Ayyaash supplicated: "O Allah! Just as you have saved me from the calamity of kufr, so too keep me contented with your decree."

„AN ENEMY OF ALLAH‟

When Hadhrat Waheeb Bin Dard (Rahmatullah alayh) was in his Maradhul Maut, the Ameer of Makkah went to visit him together with a Christian doctor. The doctor asked: "How are you?" Hadhrat Waheeb replied: "I seek refuge with Allah! Never shall I explain my condition to you."

Those present said: „Inform us. We shall explain to the doctor." Hadhrat Waheeb said:

"Subhaanallaah! What type of brains do these people have? They advise me to complain to the enemy of Allah about Allah Ta‟ala. All of you get out from here!"

MEDICAL

TREATMENT

Allaamah Abdul Wahhaab Sha‟raani (Rahmatullah alayh) of the 9th Islamic century, said that we are bound by a Pledge given to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). This specific Pledge dictates that we should abstain from medical treatment as far as possible. Sicknesses should be treated with Qur‟aanic aayaat and Dua taught by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), not initially with medicine. The venerable Allaamah explained that due to lack of yaqeen, we do not derive the benefits of the Qur‟aanic prescriptions whereas the Sahaabah and Taabieen would acquire instantaneous cure from these prescriptions.

There was a lady who was suffering from a type of fits. When she would be seized by fits she would denude herself. This lady came to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and asked that he should make dua for her cure. Although our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that he would make dua, he advised her that the better option was not to ask for cure, and to have Sabr because the rewards for Sabr are immense in the Aakhirah. The lady said that she accepts the advice and will have Sabr and not supplicate for cure. However, she asked Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to make dua that when she is seized by the fits, she should not undress and denude herself. Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) made dua for only this request, not for her cure. Henceforth she would not denude herself.

A MISER‟S SICKNESS

Once Hadhrat Haatim Asamm (Rahmatullah alayh) saw a bakheel (confirmed miser) distributing Sadqah during a severe illness. Hadhrat Haatim then made dua: "O Allah! Keep him always sick so that the sickness becomes a kaffaarah (compensation) for his sins and an aid for the poor."

CONTENTMENT they asked about his

condition, he said: "I

DURING

am contented. But, do

SICKNESS

make dua for my sick- Once when Hadhrat ness to be prolonged Fudhail Bin Iyaadh so that I do not see (Rahmatullah alayh)

people and they do was ill, people came not come to see me."

to visit him. When

A PHYSICIAN?

When Hadhrat Rabee‟ Bin Khaithoom (Rahmatullah alayh) was critically ill, he was advised to call a physician. After a brief silence, he said: "Where are the Aad and Thamud? Where are the Ashaab-e- Rass and the other many communities in between? All have been destroyed. Wallaah! I shall never call a physician."

He was pleased and contented with Allah‟s decree.

MEDICAL

TREATMENT -

WHAT IS PRIOR? T

he norm of the Salafus Saaliheen (Sahaabah, Taabieen and Tabe Taabieen) was abstention from medical treatment on the basis of Tawakkul and Ridha. Due to Imaani deficiency, medical treatment has become the prior option for us. While medical treatment is permissible, that is, treatment with halaal medicine, not haraam filth and poison, it was of secondary importance to the Sahaabah, and in fact, of no importance to the senior Sahaabah.

We are far, very far from the Age of Nubuwwat, hence we suffer from the malady of Imaani deficiency. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with resorting to medical treatment since this is allowed by the Shariah. The Ahaadith which present medical prescriptions are intended for people of our kind - people of weak Imaan - people who have no valid understanding of the meaning of Tawakkul due to being bereft of Taqwa.

The mushrikeen would frown and become extremely agitated when Tauheed was proclaimed. Today we are in an era in which even the Ulama become agitated when Tawakkul and Taqwa are mentioned. Their frowns and ludicrous interpretations imply that Tawakkul is of Asaatirul Awwaaleen (fairy tales - stupidities of the people of bygone times) just as the mushrikeen would say that Tauheed - worshipping only One Deity was of Asaatirul Awwaaleen.

While the emphasis today on medicine is understood in view of the gross deficiency of our Imaan and total lack of Tawakkul, the insane emphasis on submitting to haraam medical treatment is unacceptable and haraam. When Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) even advised that the better option was to abstain from even dua for cure, and when we are apprized of the attitude of abstention from medicine of the Salafus Saaliheen, then what should our Aql and our Imaan dictate regarding haraam medicine - regarding the filth and poison prescribed by atheists? Consult your conscience and examine your Imaan.