A mufti asks for textual proof from the kutub of Fiqh for the claim that the papsmear test renders ghusl waajib.

Answer

The obscene papsmear test renders ghusal waajib. It breaks the fast. It is horrendously obscene and haraam. The questioner mentions the condition"without desire".

What is the guarantee for the woman not developing desire when the instrument is inserted deep into her vagina by a faasiq/faajir/kaafir male doctor?

The scenario is absolutely horrendous and obscene. Imagine your wife laying with her legs wide spread open, flat on a table with her legs in stirrups and a male doctor manhandling her vagina.

How is it ever possible for a husband to even contemplate his wife being subjected to such a filthy Satanist procedure? Even if we assume that ghusal is not waajib in terms of Fiqhi masaa-il, then too Ihtiyaat and Imaani Ghairat demand that the Mufti decrees that ghusal is waajib. In fact, the mufti should decree that Tajdeed-e-Imaan is also Waajib.

When the human shaitaan inserts the instrument deep into the vagina of your wife he simulates the act of intercourse, sometimes unintentionally and in most cases intentionally. The rubbish derives carnal gratification from this insertion.

As far as Fiqhi texts are concerned, despite the claim of ghusal not being waajib mutlaqan, the Ihtiyaat is on ghusal. Check Muniyah. Furthermore, the objective

(maqsood) of this filth is not tadaawi. The objective is supposedly to test for an imaginary disease. But as far as these fujjaar are concerned this hallucinatory test is accompanied by lust as well. We have spoken to Deendaar doctors who confirm the lustful and obscene aspects.

Shaami narrating from Nooh Afendi on the basis of At-Tajnees, says: "Verily, the Mukhtaar is Wujoob-e-Ghusal when the intention is istimtaa' because shahwat is ghaalib…"

The Shaarih of Al-Muniyah states: "It is aulaa for ghusal to be waajib if the insertion is in the vagina."

Understand well that the aforementioned ikhtilaaf relates to a scenario wherein the finger is inserted for valid medical purposes. The current papsmear scenario was never imagined by the Fuqaha.

That any Mufti who understands what this satanic obscenity entails, saying that ghusal is not waajib defies credulity. Ghusal is Waajib.

If any Mufti desires to challenge this unequivocal claim, let him state his dalaa-il and have it published. Insha-Allah, we shall then with Allah's fadhl thoroughly demolish the papsmear ziggzaggery of the mufti. It is unthinkable that a mufti could find even the slightest justification for an act which puts even Iblees to shame.

Only a jaahil, maajin 'mufti' whose brains have become convoluted with papsmear filth, will search the kutub for permissibility for this nauseatingly filthy papsmear act. The issue of the obscene satanic act breaking or not breaking the fast, or ghusal becoming waajib or not should not be the consideration. The very filthy papsmear immorality should be proclaimed haraam. The full-stop should be on its prohibition. There is no need to proceed beyond this full stop. On the contrary, it will be prudent to decree Tajdeed-e-Imaan (Renewal of Imaan) for the prostitute-type woman who agrees to subject herself to such a filthy, immoral act.