Question
Here in our suburb of Robertsham, Johannesburg, we have a Darul Uloom for boys and girls. The girls are separated from the boys by one wall and 2 doors on either side of the wall. (1) Is it correct to have a Darul Uloom in this manner? (2) Did any of our akaabir establish a Darul Uloom in this way?
Answer
Every intelligent Muslim conscious of the Deen can understand the impermissibility of the system prevailing at this Madrasah. The scope for fitnah (zina and its introductory steps) is wide open. Shaitaan has a permanent presence at this 'darul uloom'. He lies in ambush to trap the students and the teachers in the fitnahwhich this type of hybrid 'darul uloom' spawns. None from the Akaabir had ever established an institution which is in blatant conflict of the Qur'aanic Aayat: "Do not come even near to zina." This institution has brought its students and staff near - very near to zina.
(3) Some of the male ustads go into the girls section where the girls are separated by a curtain. The male ustads teach the girls some of the subjects. Is this permissible?
A. It is haraam. It is the opening up of the door for zina in flagrant violation of the Qur'aanic prohibition. The worse aspect is that this evil system is marketed under a Deeni label. Shaitaan has entrapped these teachers.
(4)The Bukhari lesson is relayed to the girls side from the boys side via a microphone. The boys recite the ahaadith on the microphone which the girls can hear on the other side. Then the ustad, Moulana Hassen Dockrat explains the ahaadith. Is this permissible?
A. It is never permissible. The Maulana Sahib is extremely shortsighted, hence he is blind to the dangers inherent in this evil system. It is a co-ed system which is the initial snare of Iblees. By degrees Hijaab will be totally compromised until integration of the sexes becomes the norm. The Molvis today have drifted far, very far from even the basics of the Shariah. Shaitaan operates in extremely cunning ways. Those lacking in fiqaahat are quickly entrapped by Shaitaan. About the faqeeh, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: "One Faqeeh is harder on shaitaan than a thousand Aabid (pious worshippers)." Shaitaan has settled in the brains of the Molvis and Shaikhs of this age.
(5) When the parents of a girl come to admit their daughter to the madrasah, the parents and the girl sit at the table of the principal without any curtain separating them. In many instances, the females do not have a veil on their faces. Is it permissible for the principal to do this?
A. Even a jaahil whose Imaan has not been corrupted can understand that the principal is involved in Kabeerah sins. The abandonment of hijaab by the principal and parents is a dastardly act of immorality. This is the way in which shaitaan entraps people to fall into zina.
(6) After classes are dismissed, the principal stands on the balcony and watches the girls leaving the madrasah premises. He does this to prevent any interaction with the boys. Is it permissible for the principal to do this?
A. This action of the principal is another satanic ruse to trade immorality under Deeni guise. This is another degree of the erosion of hijaab to open the door wide for total abandonment of Hijaab and for the commission of zina. The brains of the principal are satanically vermiculated. If he employs his Aql without contaminating it with his nafsaaniyat, he will then readily understand the evil of his act.
- Source
- themajlis.co.za
- Published in
- The Majlis Vol 25 No 07
- PDF page
- 9
Verbatim verified against the source PDF
Appears under TABLIGHDAMAADG@:PARENTS. This heading is the nearest headline at or before the page and is approximate. Do not cite it alone.